4.8 Review

Tools and strategies of systems metabolic engineering for the development of microbial cell factories for chemical production

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 49, Issue 14, Pages 4615-4636

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cs00155d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. C1 Gas Refinery Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2016M3D3A1A01913250]
  2. Hanwha Chemical through the KAIST-Hanwha Chemical Future Technology Institute
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016M3D3A1A01913250] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sustainable production of chemicals from renewable non-food biomass has become a promising alternative to overcome environmental issues caused by our heavy dependence on fossil resources. Systems metabolic engineering, which integrates traditional metabolic engineering with systems biology, synthetic biology, and evolutionary engineering, is enabling the development of microbial cell factories capable of efficiently producing a myriad of chemicals and materials including biofuels, bulk and fine chemicals, polymers, amino acids, natural products and drugs. In this paper, many tools and strategies of systems metabolic engineering, includingin silicogenome-scale metabolic simulation, sophisticated enzyme engineering, optimal gene expression modulation,in vivobiosensors,de novopathway design, and genomic engineering, employed for developing microbial cell factories are reviewed. Also, detailed procedures of systems metabolic engineering used to develop microbial strains producing chemicals and materials are showcased. Finally, future challenges and perspectives in further advancing systems metabolic engineering and establishing biorefineries are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available