4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

The development of algebraic stress models using a novel evolutionary algorithm

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 298-318

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2017.09.017

Keywords

RANS modelling; Machine-learning; Evolutionary algorithm; Gene expression programming; Algebraic stress modelling

Funding

  1. veski
  2. EPSRC Doctoral Training Centre [EP/G03690X/1]
  3. Australian Government
  4. Government of Western Australia
  5. Pawsey Supercomputing Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work presents developments to a novel evolutionary framework that symbolically regresses algebraic forms of the Reynolds stress anisotropy tensor. This work contributes to the growing trend in machine-learning for modelling physical phenomena. Our framework is shown to be computational inexpensive and produce accurate and robust models that are tangible mathematical expressions. This transparency in the result allows us to diagnose issues with the regressed formulae and appropriately make amendments, as we further understand the regression tools. Such models are created using hybrid RANS/LES flow field data and a passive solving of the RANS transport equations to obtain the modelled time scale. This process shows that models can be regressed from a qualitatively correct flow field and fully resolved DNS is not necessarily required. Models are trained and tested using rectangular ducts, an example flow genus that linear RANS models even qualitatively fail to predict correctly. A priori and a posteriori testing of the new models show that the framework is a viable methodology for RANS closure development. This a posteriori agenda includes testing on an asymmetric diffuser, for which the new models vastly outperform the baseline linear model. Therefore this study presents one of the most rigorous and complete CFD validation of machine learnt turbulent stress models to date.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available