4.5 Article

Matsubara-Takahashi cervix-holding technique for massive postpartum hemorrhage in patients with placenta previa with or without placenta accreta spectrum disorders

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
Volume 140, Issue 3, Pages 357-364

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12390

Keywords

Holding the cervix; Placenta accreta spectrum; Placenta previa; Postpartum hemorrhage; Transarterial embolization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of the Matsubara-Takahashi cervix-holding technique (MT-holding) for achieving hemostasis for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Methods: The present retrospective observational study included data from deliveries that occurred between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2014, at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan. Deliveries were included where patients experienced blood loss greater than 2500mL and MT-holding was used. The success rates of the technique in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders and PPH were determined; subsequent pregnancy outcomes were also examined. Results: There were 53 deliveries included in the study; 29 patients had placenta previa and 8 of these patients also had PAS disorders. MT-holding achieved hemostasis in 15 (71%) and 4 (50%) patients with placenta previa without and with PAS disorders, respectively; the placenta was removed in the latter. Overall, MT-holding achieved hemostasis in 40 (75%) deliveries. Of nine patients who became pregnant after this procedure, six went on to have full-term deliveries. Conclusion: MT-holding achieved hemostasis in 50% of patients with PAS disorders and had an overall success rate of 75% for PPH, comparable to other uterus-sparing procedures. MT-holding is suggested as a simple, effective, safe technique available to less-experienced obstetrician; these findings require confirmation in larger studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available