4.5 Article

Expectations and needs of Ugandan women for improved quality of childbirth care in health facilities: A qualitative study

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12405

Keywords

Childbirth; Facility birth; Hospital birth; Maternal health; Quality of care; Uganda

Funding

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
  3. UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe the experiences, expectations, and needs of urban Ugandan women in relation to good-quality facility childbirth. Methods: Women who had given birth in the 12months prior to the study were purposively sampled and interviewed, or included in focus groups. Thematic analysis was used, and the data were interpreted within the context of an existing quality of care framework. Results: Forty-five in-depth interviews and six focus group discussions were conducted. Respect and dignity, timely communication, competent skilled staff, and availability of medical supplies were central to women's accounts of quality care, or a lack of it. The hope for a live baby motivated women to seek facility-based childbirth. They expected to encounter competent, respectful, and caring staff with appropriate skills. In some cases, they could only fulfill these expectations through additional personal financial payments to staff, for clinical supplies, or to guarantee that they would be attended by someone with suitable skills. Conclusion: Long-term improvement in quality of maternity care in Uganda requires enhancement of the interaction between women and health staff in facilities, and investment in staff and resources to ensure that safe, respectful care is not dependent on willingness and/or capacity to pay.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available