4.0 Article

Fitness profile of young female volleyball players

Journal

MEDICINA DELLO SPORT
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages 197-209

Publisher

EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
DOI: 10.23736/S0025-7826.20.03698-4

Keywords

Volleyball; Motor skills; Athletic performance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Factors that influence performance in volleyball, in terms of motor skills, refer to muscle power, speed and agility. This study aimed to examine the abilities and physical characteristics of female volleyball players in terms of age and player specialization. METHODS: A total of 35 subjects (junior and cadet age), participated in this study. Subjects were assessed for body height, mass, spike and block reach, and body composition. Vertical jump, standing broad jump, spike and block jump were tests used to measure leg power. The running speed was evaluated with a 20-m single-sprint effort. The change of direction speed was assessed with a T-test, the sprint 9-3-6-3-9 m forward-backward shuttle and sprint 9-36-3-9 m with 180 degrees turns. Two-way ANOVA with LSD post-hoc test was applied in order to examine whether there is a statistically significant difference (P=0.05) between team, position and their interaction, using SPSS v. 20.0. RESULTS: There was not a statistically significant interaction between the effects of team and position on anthropometric measures and motor abilities of volleyball players. Age, training years and technical-tactical knowledge of junior players led to better performance in all conducted tests of motor abilities in comparison to young female cadet players. According to the position, the majority of motor tests showed no differences between players. CONCLUSIONS: These results might be useful for strength and conditioning professionals who work with young female volleyball players of a similar age and competition level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available