4.8 Review

Structure and performance of the LiFePO4cathode material: from the bulk to the surface

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 12, Issue 28, Pages 15036-15044

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr03776a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0700600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21603007, 51672012]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research Grant [JCYJ20160531141048950, JCYJ20150729111733470]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, LiFePO(4)is one of the most successfully commercialized cathode materials in the rechargeable lithium-ion battery (LIB) system, owing to its excellent safety performance and remarkable electrochemical properties and is expected to have a broader market in the near future. Although it is widely recognized that the crystalline structure of a cathode material largely dictates its electrochemical properties (e.g.capacity, cycle life and rate capabilities), this intrinsic connection in LiFePO(4)has not been systematically reviewed. Different from the previous reviews, which mainly focus on the improvement of electrochemical performance by all kinds of techniques, in this review, the relationship between its electrochemical performance and bulk/surface structure is reviewed and discussed. First, it is revealed that the intra-particle Li(+)transfer is influenced by several properties of the bulk, including crystalline structures, antisite defects and electronic structures. Next, it is demonstrated that the surface/interfacial structures of LiFePO4, which can be reconstructed artificially or spontaneously, also have great impacts on the performances. Lastly, the intrinsic connection between the structure and performance is preliminarily established, showing brand-new perspectives on the strategy for further improvement and contributing to a comprehensive understanding of LiFePO4.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available