4.5 Article

The multi-faceted nature of visual statistical learning: Individual differences in learning conditional and distributional regularities across time and space

Journal

PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 1291-1299

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01781-0

Keywords

Statistical learning; Domain-general mechanisms; Modality specificity; Individual differences; Psychometrics

Funding

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship
  2. Australian Research Council [LP160100008]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP160100008] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emerging research has demonstrated that statistical learning is a modality-specific ability governed by domain-general principles. Yet limited research has investigated different forms of statistical learningwithinmodality. This paper explores whether there is one unified statistical learning mechanism within the visual modality, or separate task-specific abilities. To do so, we examined individual differences in spatial and nonspatial conditional and distributional statistical learning. Participants completed four visual statistical learning tasks: conditional spatial, conditional nonspatial, distributional spatial, and distributional nonspatial. Performance on all four tasks significantly correlated with each other, and performance on all tasks accounted for a large portion of the variance across tasks (57%). Interestingly, a portion of the variance of task performance (between 11% and 18%) was also accounted for by performance on each of the individual tasks. Our results suggest that visual statistical learning is the result of the interplay between a unified mechanism for extracting conditional and distributional statistical regularities across time and space, and an individual's ability to extract specific types of regularities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available