4.7 Article

Electron Density Structure of the Local Galactic Disk

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 897, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab98f9

Keywords

Pulsars; Galaxy structure; Interstellar medium; Milky Way disk; H II regions; Superbubbles

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AAG-1815242]
  2. NSF [PHY-1430284]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pulsar dispersion measures (DMs) have been used to model the electron density of the interstellar medium (ISM) in the Galactic disk as a plane-parallel medium, despite significant scatter in the DM-distance distribution and strong evidence for inhomogeneities in the ISM. We use a sample of pulsars with independent distance measurements to evaluate a model of the local ISM in the thick disk of the Galaxy that incorporates turbulent fluctuations, clumps, and voids in the electron density. The latter two components are required because about one-third of the lines of sight are discrepant from a strictly plane-parallel model. A likelihood analysis for smooth components of the model yields a scale height z(0) = 1.57(-0.14)(+0.15) kpc and a mid-plane density n(0) = 0.015 +/- 0.001 cm(-3). The scatter in the DM-distance distribution is dominated by clumps and voids but receives significant contributions from a broad spectrum of density fluctuations, such as a Kolmogorov spectrum. The model is used to identify lines of sight with outlier values of DM. Three of these pulsars, J1614-2230, J1623-0908, and J1643-1224, lie behind known H II regions, and the electron density model is combined with H alpha intensity data to constrain the filling factors and other substructure properties of the H II regions (Sh 2-7 and Sh 2-27). Several pulsars also exhibit enhanced DM fluctuations that are likely caused by an intersection of their lines of sight with the superbubble GSH 238+00+09.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available