4.7 Article

Fabrication of a self-assembled honeycomb nanofibrous scaffold to guide endothelial morphogenesis

Journal

BIOFABRICATION
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab9988

Keywords

electrospinning; honeycomb; nanofibrous; angiogenesis

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council [201508610081]
  2. Dutch Province of Limburg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Controlling angiogenesis within tissue engineered constructs remains a critical challenge, especially with regard to the guidance of pre-vascular network formation. Here, we aimed to regulate angiogenesis on a self-assembled honeycomb nanofibrous scaffold. Scaffolds with honeycombs patterns have several desirable properties for tissue engineering, including large surface area, high structural stability and good permeability. Furthermore, the honeycomb pattern resembles early vascular network formation. The self-assembly electrospinning approach to honeycomb scaffolds is a technically simple, rapid, and direct way to realize selective deposition of nanofibers. To evaluate cell compatibility, spreading, proliferation and tube formation, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were cultured on honeycomb scaffolds, as well as on random scaffolds for comparison. The optimized honeycomb nanofibrous scaffolds were observed to better support cell proliferation and network formation, which can facilitate angiogenesis. Moreover, HUVECs cultured on the honeycomb scaffolds were observed to reorganize their cell bodies into tube-like structures containing a central lumen, while this was not observed on random scaffolds. This work has shown that the angiogenic response can be guided by honeycomb scaffolds, allowing improved early HUVECs organization. The guided organization via honeycomb scaffolds can be utilized for tissue engineering applications that require the formation of microvascular networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available