4.6 Article

The coarse-grained models of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(propylene oxide) homopolymers and poloxamers in big multipole water (BMW) and MARTINI frameworks

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 28, Pages 15976-15985

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp01006e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21534004, 21833008]
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation [KAW 2018.0380]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyethylene oxide (PEO) and poly(propylene oxide) (PPO), especially their tri-block copolymers PEO-PPO-PEO (poloxamers), have a broad range of applications in biotechnology and medical science. Understanding their specific interactions with biomembranes is the key to unveil the unique features of poloxamers either as membrane-healing or membrane pore-forming agents. Based on the coarse-graining convention of the MARTINI force field and the big multipole water (BMW) model, which has a three charged site topology and can reproduce the correct dipole moment of four-water clusters, we generated coarse-grained (CG) models with analytical and numerical potentials for PEO and PPO homopolymers and poloxamers in dilute solution. The effective bonded interaction potentials between CG beads were determined from the probability distributions of bond lengths, angles and dihedrals that are determined from atomistic simulations. The nonbonded interaction parameters were fine-tuned to reproduce the conformational properties of atomistic PEO and PPO homopolymers and poloxamersviaextensive CG simulations of PEO and PPO homopolymers and poloxamers in a BMW water environment. The reported CG models provide a promising framework for a comprehensive understanding of the microstructural, conformational, and dynamic properties of poloxamers and their delicate interactions with other species in an explicit water environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available