4.5 Article

Enhanced methane producing microbial electrolysis cells for wastewater treatment using poly(neutral red) and chitosan modified electrodes

Journal

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 4, Issue 8, Pages 4238-4248

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0se00770f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Austrian Climate and Energy Fund within the MELOS project [861392]
  2. Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) [Z222-N19]
  3. K1-MET GmbH
  4. metallurgical competence centre
  5. COMET (Competence Centre for Excellent Technologies)
  6. Austrian program for competence centres
  7. Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation, and Technology
  8. Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs
  9. province of Upper Austria
  10. province of Tyrol
  11. province of Styria
  12. Styrian Business Promotion Agency (SFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) consisting of a bioanode and biocathode offer a promising solution for wastewater treatment. These systems can degrade organic substances at the bioanode while converting carbon dioxide (CO2), a major greenhouse gas, to a value-added fuel, methane (CH4) at the biocathode. The bioelectrodes were inoculated with a mixed culture under anaerobic conditions. By applying a constant potential of 0.40 Vvs.Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl), the long-term performance of MECs has been studied by monitoring the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) in the anolyte which contained synthetic wastewater and CH4generation in the cathode chamber. To investigate the effect of electrode modification, poly(neutral red) and chitosan modified carbon felt electrodes were prepared, and applied in MECs. The results revealed that MECs with modified electrodes showed remarkably enhanced overall performance. The average COD removal efficiency, faradaic efficiency towards CO2reduction to CH4and CH4production yield of modified MECs were up to 67%, 55% and 0.14 LCH4/gCOD, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available