4.3 Article

Quantifying farmers' climate change adaptation strategies and the strategy determinants in Southwest China

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJCCSM-12-2019-0073

Keywords

Adaptation; Sustainable livelihood; Income diversification; Adaptation barrier; Climate change perceptions; Lijiang

Funding

  1. International Development Research Centre's (IDRC) - National Natural Science Foundation of China [41661144002]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [16JJD850015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose This paper aims to document the adaptation strategies developed by local farmers to adjust to climate change and related hazards in Lijiang Prefecture in Southwest China, and quantify the determinants of the adaptation measures. Design/methodology/approach The study conducted a household survey with 433 respondents in Lijiang to documents adaptation measures. The authors used a multivariate probit model to quantify five categories of adaptation measures against a set of household features, extension and information, resources, social network, financial assets and perception variables. Findings The most significant determinants consisted of information on early climate warnings and impending hazards, ownership to land and livestock, irrigation membership in community-based organisations, household savings, cash crop farming and perceptions of climate change and its related hazards. Adaptation strategies and policies highlighting these determinants could help to improve climate change adaptation in the region. Originality/value This study quantified the determinants of adaptive strategies and mapped important determinants for the region that will provide farmers with the appropriate resources and information to implement the best practices for adapting to climatic changes. The method and findings could be useful and easily replicable for future agriculture policies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available