4.7 Article

Winter wheat mapping using a random forest classifier combined with multi-temporal and multi-sensor data

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages 783-802

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2017.1356388

Keywords

Winter wheat; random forest; phenology; Landsat-8; GF-1

Funding

  1. European Space Agency
  2. National Remote Sensing Centre of China [10668]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471341]
  4. '135' Strategy Planning of the Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, CAS [Y3SG1500CX]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wheat is a major staple food crop in China. Accurate and cost-effective wheat mapping is exceedingly critical for food production management, food security warnings, and food trade policy-making in China. To reduce confusion between wheat and non-wheat crops for accurate growth stage wheat mapping, we present a novel approach that combines a random forest (RF) classifier with multi-sensor and multi-temporal image data. This study aims to (1) determine whether an RF combined with multi-sensor and multi-temporal imagery can achieve accurate winter wheat mapping, (2) to find out whether the proposed approach can provide improved performance over the traditional classifiers, and (3) examine the feasibility of deriving reliable estimates of winter wheat-growing areas from medium-resolution remotely sensed data. Winter wheat mapping experiments were conducted in Boxing County. The experimental results suggest that the proposed method can achieve good performance, with an overall accuracy of 92.9% and a kappa coefficient () of 0.858. The winter wheat acreage was estimated at 33,895.71ha with a relative error of only 9.3%. The effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed approach has been evaluated through comparison with other image classification methods. We conclude that the proposed approach can provide accurate delineation of winter wheat areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available