4.2 Article

Correlation Between Microstructure and Tensile Properties of STS 316L and Inconel 718 Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting (SLM)

Journal

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages 6807-6814

Publisher

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2020.18792

Keywords

Selective Laser Melting; STS 316L; Inconel 718; Tensile Properties

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MS IP) [2018R1A5A6075959]
  2. Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program - Ministry of Trade, industry and Energy (MOTIE, Republic of Korea) [10062304]
  3. Technology innovation Program - Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea) [20002700]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20002700, 10062304] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The correlation between microstructure and tensile properties of selective laser melting (SLM) processed STS 316L and Inconel 718 were investigated at various heights (top, middle and bottom) and planes (YZ, ZX and XY). Columnar grains and dendrites were formed by directional growth during solidification. The average melt pool width and depth, and scan track width were similar in both specimens due to fixed processing parameters. SLM Inconel 718 has moderate tensile strength (1165 MPa) and tensile elongation (11.5%), whereas SLM STS 316L has outstanding tensile strength (656 MPa) and tensile elongation (75%) compared to other SLM processed STS 316L. Fine columnar diameter (0.5 mu m) and dense microstructures (porosity: 0.35%) in SLM STS 316L promoted the enhancement of tensile elongation by suitable processing condition. Fractographic analysis suggested that the lack of fusion pore with unmelted powder should be avoided to increase tensile properties by controlling processing parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available