4.4 Article

Complex Gait Is Related to Cognitive Functioning in Older People: A Cross-Sectional Study Providing an Innovative Test

Journal

GERONTOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages 401-408

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000508245

Keywords

Clinical evaluation; Cognitive impairment; Cognitive task; Fitness; Functional evaluation; Gait performance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background:Many studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between gait performance and cognitive impairment. The main purposes of this study were: (1) to design and validate a complex gait test (CGT) in older people, (2) to analyze the effects of age and sex on CGT, and (3) to analyze the association between CGT performance and physical functioning and cognitive measures.Methods:A total of 279 older people (60-97 years) were analyzed in 2019. Fitness tests, gait performance, and several cognitive measures such asthe Trail-Walking Test and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were used.Results:The CGT reported adequate reliability and validity parameters. In the test-retest analysis, the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.868 (p< 0.001). There was a significant correlation between the CGT and Trail-Walking Test (r= 0.592;p< 0.001). The linear regression analysis showed that the CGT was associated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (R-2 = 0.357;p =0.001). The binary logistic regression analysis revealed that a high CGT score was a risk factor for mild cognitive impairment (odds ratio 1.201, 95% CI 1.081-1.334;p= 0.001). The ROC curve of the mild cognitive impairment was predicted by the CGT performance (area under the curve = 0.768, 95% CI 0.647-0.889;p< 0.001), reaching the cut-off point at 20.25 s.Conclusions:The CGT showed good reliability and validity and may serve as a potential biomarker in mild cognitive impairment prediction in older adults aged 60-97 years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available