4.7 Article

A new method for TOC estimation in tight shale gas reservoirs

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages 269-277

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2017.06.011

Keywords

Total organic carbon; Gaussian Process Regression; Shale gas; Wireline logs; Machine learning

Funding

  1. Special Fund from the State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics at Northwest University in China
  2. Donors of the Shaanxi Province Specialized Research Fund of Higher Education [14JK1740]
  3. Foundation of Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization of Mineral resources

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Total organic carbon (TOC) estimation is significantly crucial for shale reservoir characterization. Traditional TOC estimation methods (such as Passey and Schmoker method) do not provide accurate TOC predictions in shale gas reservoirs especially for the self-generated and self-stored reservoirs. This study proposes, for the first time, a new TOC prediction method based on Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) bridging geostatistics and machine learning technique. The method utilizes a non-parametric regression approach in shale TOC predictions, and not only provides the expert solutions in high-dimension processing, small samples and non-linear problems, but also has a better adaptation and generalization ability compared with other machine learning methods. The approach accounts for all the well logging attributes and chooses the relevant logs to build TOC estimation model, and 7 different kernel functions and 5 attributes groups are analyzed to get the optimized hyperparameters in practice. Application of the developed model to two shale gas reservoirs showed that the model predicted TOC matched well with that from the laboratory measurements. The proposed model based on GPR method provides an accurate way for the TOC prediction in the tight shale gas reservoirs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available