4.7 Article

Simultaneous removal of Hg0 and SO2 from flue gas using vacuum ultraviolet radiation combining with absorption of urea solution

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages 41-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2016.08.001

Keywords

Vacuum ultraviolet (VUV); SO2 removal; Hg-0 removal; Urea solution; Ozone and hydroxyl free radicals (.OH)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51576094, 51206067]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Special Project [2015T80516]
  3. Training Project of Jiangsu University Youth Backbone Teacher

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel process on simultaneous removal of SO2 and Hg-0 from flue gas using vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) radiation combining with absorption of urea solution was developed. Several process parameters (e.g., VUV radiated power, O-2 content, solution pH, solution temperature, SO2 content, liquid-gas ratio, urea concentration and Hg-0 content) of He removal process were studied and optimized in a semicontinuous and small-scale photochemical reactor. Products and intermediates of SO2 and Hg-0 simultaneous removal were measured. Chemistry of Hg-0 removal was also investigated initially. Results show that an increase in VUV radiated power, O-2 content or liquid-gas ratio promotes He removal. Increasing solution temperature, SO2 content or Hg-0 content reduces Hg removal efficiency. Increasing solution pH or urea concentration has a dual impact on Hg-0 removal. SO2 reaches 100% removal efficiency under all test conditions. The highest simultaneous removal efficiency is 100% for SO2 and 98.1% for Hg. Hg2+ and SO42- are the final products of Hg and SO2 oxidation, respectively. Ozone and hydroxyl free radicals are successfully captured. The ozone, oxygen atom and hydroxyl free radicals are proved to be the most important oxidants for oxidation removal of Hg-0. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available