4.2 Article

Something to despair: Gender differences in adverse childhood experiences among rural patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108056

Keywords

Adverse childhood events; Opioid use disorder; Gender

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [U54GM104942]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Existing research has demonstrated that patients in treatment for an opioid use disorder (OUD) have high rates of adverse childhood experiences (ACE) compared to community-based samples. While research has documented important gender differences in ACEs in patients with OUD receiving treatment in urban areas, research has not shown whether these findings would generalize to rural and Appalachian areas, which are known to have lower ACE scores. We conducted a secondary analysis of existing clinical data, utilizing intake assessment data from a rural Appalachian outpatient buprenorphine program. We restricted the sample to patients with an OUD who presented for treatment between June 2018 and June 2019 (n = 173). The clinical intake assessment included a modified 17-item ACE instrument that patients self-administered. More than half (54.3%) of patients reported having experienced 4+ categories of adverse childhood experiences. On average, females endorsed 4.5 categories of adverse experiences, whereas males endorsed 3.3 (p < 0.00); female patients were significantly more likely to have experienced sexual abuse (42.4% versus 10.6%, p < 0.00). Alarmingly, 25.9% of females and 8.2% of males reported being forced to have sex before age 18. Disproportionately high rates of childhood adversities, particularly among females, may partially explain despair in rural Appalachian areas. OUD treatment programs should conduct clinical assessments of trauma and integrate trauma-informed care into drug treatment, especially for female patients residing in rural Appalachia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available