4.6 Article

The optimal co-doping of SrFe1-xCoxO3-δoxygen carriers in redox applications

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 29, Pages 16721-16726

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp02835e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Energy Technology Laboratory's (NETL's) on-going research program in Advanced Sensors and Controls
  2. agency of the United States Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the oxygen carrier SrCoO(3)has higher redox activity than SrFeO3, cobalt is both more expensive and scarcer than iron, which would hinder the wide implementation of SrCoO3. For these reasons, doping SrFeO(3)with Co is a potential compromise, benefitting the redox properties of SrFeO3, while still limiting the overall amount of cobalt being used. To find the optimal level of Co-doping, density functional theory calculations were performed to investigate the Co-doping effect on the oxygen vacancy formation and oxygen migration in SrFe1-xCoxO3-delta(x= 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.375, 0.5). Our findings show that the oxygen vacancy formation energies (E-f) decrease with the increase of Co content resulting from the increased composition of the O-2p band at the Fermi level upon Co doping. In particular, theE(f)decreases nearly 0.5 eV between thex= 0 andx= 0.25 samples whileE(f)only decreases 0.1 eV further as Co content is increased tox= 0.5. We obtain thatx= 0.25 is an optimal cost/benefit ratio for Co doping, which is preserved at both low oxygen vacancy concentrations (delta= 0.0625 values listed above) and at high concentrations of delta= 0.1875 and 0.375. Kinetically, the oxygen migration barrier has slight change upon Co doping due to the similar size of Co and Fe. Therefore, considering both redox activity and economics in reversible oxygen storage applications,x= 0.25 is suggested as the optimal Co-doping value in SrFe1-xCoxO3-delta.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available