4.6 Article

Monolayer PC5/PC6: promising anode materials for lithium-ion batteries

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 29, Pages 16665-16671

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp01133a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [PolyU152208/18E]
  2. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [RHA3]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province of China [2019A050510012]
  4. NSFC [11804286]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [19lgpy263]
  6. Special Program for Applied Research on Super Computation of the NSFC Guangdong Joint Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Employing two-dimensional (2D) materials as anodes for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is believed to be an effective approach to meet the growing demands of high-capacity next-generation LIBs. In this work, the first-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations are employed to evaluate the potential application of two-dimensional phosphorus carbide (2D PCx,x= 2, 5, and 6) monolayers as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. The 2D PC(x)systems are predicted to show outstanding structural stability and electronic properties. From the nudged elastic band calculations, the single Li atom shows extreme high diffusivities on the PC(x)monolayer with low energy barriers of 0.18 eV for PC2, 0.47 eV for PC5, and 0.44 eV for PC6. We further demonstrate that the theoretical specific capacity of monolayer PC(5)and PC(6)can reach up to 1251.7 and 1235.9 mA h g(-1), respectively, several times that of a graphite anode used in commercial LIBs. These results suggest that both PC(5)and PC(6)monolayers are promising anode materials for LIBs. Our work opens a new avenue to explore novel 2D materials in energy applications, where phosphorus carbides could be used as high-performance anode in LIBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available