4.3 Article

Fully-automated left ventricular mass and volume MRI analysis in the UK Biobank population cohort: evaluation of initial results

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 281-291

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1225-9

Keywords

Ventricular function; Automated analysis; UK Biobank

Funding

  1. British Heart Foundation [PG/14/89/31194]
  2. National Institutes of Health (USA) [1R01HL121754]
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre based at The Oxford University Hospitals Trust at the University of Oxford
  4. British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence
  5. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Barts Health NHS Trust
  6. SmartHeart EPSRC programme grant [EP/P001009/1]
  7. EPSRC [EP/P001009/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. British Heart Foundation [PG/15/71/31731, PG/14/89/31194] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P001009/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Medical Research Council [MC_qA137853] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

UK Biobank, a large cohort study, plans to acquire 100,000 cardiac MRI studies by 2020. Although fully-automated left ventricular (LV) analysis was performed in the original acquisition, this was not designed for unsupervised incorporation into epidemiological studies. We sought to evaluate automated LV mass and volume (Siemens syngo InlineVF versions D13A and E11C), against manual analysis in a substantial sub-cohort of UK Biobank participants. Eight readers from two centers, trained to give consistent results, manually analyzed 4874 UK Biobank cases for LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF) and LV mass (LVM). Agreement between manual and InlineVF automated analyses were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Tenfold cross-validation was used to establish a linear regression calibration between manual and InlineVF results. InlineVF D13A returned results in 4423 cases, whereas InlineVF E11C returned results in 4775 cases and also reported LVM. Rapid visual assessment of the E11C results found 178 cases (3.7%) with grossly misplaced contours or landmarks. In the remaining 4597 cases, LV function showed good agreement: ESV -6.4 +/- 9.0 ml, 0.853 (mean +/- SD of the differences, ICC) EDV -3.0 +/- 11.6 ml, 0.937; SV 3.4 +/- 9.8 ml, 0.855; and EF 3.5 +/- 5.1%, 0.586. Although LV mass was consistently overestimated (29.9 +/- 17.0 g, 0.534) due to larger epicardial contours on all slices, linear regression could be used to correct the bias and improve accuracy. Automated InlineVF results can be used for case-control studies in UK Biobank, provided visual quality control and linear bias correction are performed. Improvements between InlineVF D13A and InlineVF E11C show the field is rapidly advancing, with further improvements expected in the near future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available