4.3 Article

COVID-19 and eating disorders during confinement: Analysis of factors associated with resilience and aggravation of symptoms

Journal

EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 855-863

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/erv.2771

Keywords

confinement; COVID-19; eating disorders; mental health; personality

Funding

  1. Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red-Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutricion
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya - PERIS [SLT006/17/00246]
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI17/01167]
  4. Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte (Spain)-FPU [FPU16/01453]
  5. PostResidency Grant from Research Committee of the University Hospital of Bellvitge (HUB
  6. Barcelona, Spain) 2019-2020

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To assess the level of deterioration in functioning of ED patients during confinement, due to COVID-19, and examine potential contributing factors (coping strategies, anxiety-depressive symptomatology and personality traits). Methods A total of 74 ED patients in treatment before the COVID-19 outbreak, contributed to this study. Baseline pre-treatment evaluation included the SCL-90R, TCI-R, EDI-2 and Y-FAS 2.0 questionnaires for general psychopathology, personality and ED severity indexes. ED symptoms, coping strategies, socio-demographic data and COVID-19 concerns were collected by clinicians through a semi-structured telephone survey during lockdown. Results A deterioration in ED symptoms and general psychopathology (anxiety and depression), during lockdown, was associated with low self-directedness. Higher ED symptomatology during confinement was associated with less-adaptive coping strategies to deal with lockdown situation leading to an increase in weight. Conclusions These specific vulnerability factors to further confinement or stressful situations may help design personalized preventive and therapeutic approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available