4.7 Article

Light Field Super-Resolution By Jointly Exploiting Internal and External Similarities

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCSVT.2019.2921660

Keywords

Spatial resolution; Cameras; Correlation; Light fields; Two dimensional displays; Light field; super-resolution; projection; deep learning

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0700800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61671419, 91732304]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Light field images taken by plenoptic cameras often have a tradeoff between spatial and angular resolutions. In this paper, we propose a novel spatial super-resolution approach for light field images by jointly exploiting internal and external similarities. The internal similarity refers to the correlations across the angular dimensions of the 4D light field itself, while the external similarity refers to the cross-scale correlations learned from an external light field dataset. Specifically, we advance the classic projection-based method that exploits the internal similarity by introducing the intensity consistency checking criterion and a back-projection refinement, while the external correlation is learned by a CNN-based method which aggregates all warped high-resolution sub-aperture images upsampled from the low-resolution input using a single image super-resolution method. By analyzing the error distributions of the above two methods and investigating the upperbound of combining them, we find that the internal and external similarities are complementary to each other. Accordingly, we further propose a pixel-wise adaptive fusion network to take advantage of both their merits by learning a weighting matrix. Experimental results on both synthetic and real-world light field datasets validate the superior performance of the proposed approach over the state-of-the-arts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available