Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Comparing SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology as primary test method: SurePath is associated with increased CIN II+ detection rates
Kirsten Rozemeijer et al.
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL (2016)
Cervical cancer screening and follow-up in 4 geographically diverse US health care systems, 1998 through 2007
Sheila Weinmann et al.
CANCER (2015)
Use of Primary High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening Interim Clinical Guidance
Warner K. Huh et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2015)
HPV testing as a screen for cervical cancer
Annekathryn Goodman
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
Quantifying and monitoring overdiagnosis in cancer screening: a systematic review of methods
Jamie L. Carter et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
HPV testing as a screen for cervical cancer
Annekathryn Goodman
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
Quantifying and monitoring overdiagnosis in cancer screening: a systematic review of methods
Jamie L. Carter et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
Patients' Expectations of the Benefits and Harms of Treatments, Screening, and Tests A Systematic Review
Tammy C. Hoffmann et al.
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2015)
Human papillomavirus testing 2007-2012: Co-testing and triage utilization and impact on subsequent clinical management
Jack Cuzick et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2015)
A Population-Based Evaluation of Cervical Screening in the United States: 2008-2011
Jack Cuzick et al.
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION (2014)
Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review
Liliane Zorzela et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)
Effect of ageing on cervical or vaginal cancer in Swedish women previously treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: population based cohort study of long term incidence and mortality
Bjorn Strander et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)
Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews
Pooja Saini et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)
Too Much Medicine Happens Too Often The Teachable Moment and a Call for Manuscripts From Clinical Trainees
Tanner J. Caverly et al.
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2014)
The HPV test has similar sensitivity but more overdiagnosis than the Pap testA randomised health services study on cervical cancer screening in Finland
Nea Malila et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2013)
Quantification of harms in cancer screening trials: literature review
Bruno Heleno et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)
Regional and temporal variation in hysterectomy rates and surgical routes for benign diseases in the Netherlands
Miriam M. F. Hanstede et al.
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA (2012)
Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Virginia A. Moyer
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2012)
Having a Pap smear, quality of life before and after cervical screening: a questionnaire study
I. J. Korfage et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2012)
Adverse obstetrical outcomes after treatment of precancerous cervical lesions: a Belgian multicentre study
C. Simoens et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2012)
American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer
Debbie Saslow et al.
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2012)
Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States and the Netherlands: A Tale of Two Countries
Dik Habbema et al.
MILBANK QUARTERLY (2012)
The psychosocial impact of an abnormal cervical smear result
Melanie Drolet et al.
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY (2012)
Effects of Streamlining Cervical Cancer Screening the Dutch Way Consequences of Changes in the Dutch KOPAC-Based Follow-up Protocol and Consensus-Based Limitation of Equivocal Cytology
Martijn C. Briet et al.
ACTA CYTOLOGICA (2010)
Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Risk of Preterm Birth
Claudia L. Werner et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2010)
After-effects reported by women following colposcopy, cervical biopsies and LLETZ: results from the TOMBOLA trial
Linda Sharp et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2009)
Accuracy of self-reports of Pap and mammography screening compared to medical record: a meta-analysis
Michelle Howard et al.
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL (2009)
Evidence for Frequent Regression of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia-Grade 2
Philip E. Castle et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2009)
Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study
Margaret R. E. McCredie et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2008)
Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study
Susanne Albrechtsen et al.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2008)
Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis
M. Arbyn et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2008)
Monitoring a national cancer prevention program: Successful changes in cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands
Matejka Rebolj et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2007)
Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis
M Kyrgiou et al.
LANCET (2006)
The Dutch CISOE-A framework for cytology reporting increases efficacy of screening upon standardisation since 1996
S Bulk et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY (2004)
American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer
D Saslow et al.
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2002)
Share Paper
