4.1 Article

Effect of γ′ precipitate size on hardness and creep properties of Ni-base single crystal superalloys: Experiment and simulation

Journal

MATERIALIA
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100692

Keywords

Superalloys; gamma/gamma ' Microstructure; Hardness; Indentation; Creep; Phase-field; Crystal plasticity

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB/TR103]
  2. Fundamental Research Program of Korea Institute of Materials Science [PNK6410]
  3. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [PNK6410] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role and effect of gamma' precipitate size on the mechanical properties of Ni-base single crystal superalloy is investigated. The underlying mechanisms are analyzed on the one hand with the help of experiments including hardness and creep tests, and on the other hand with the help of two different simulation approaches by taking the typical gamma/gamma' microstructure into account. Simulations, based on the crystal plasticity finite element method (CPFEM) are carried out for the hardness tests, whereas simulations, based on the crystal plasticity coupled phase-field method (CPPFM) are carried out for the creep tests. The hardness test simulation results show that the hardness of material varies inversely with the size of gamma' precipitates for a given gamma' phase volume fraction and it varies directly with the volume fraction of gamma' precipitates for a given precipitate size. These results are qualitatively consistent with the experimental observations. The creep simulation results show that the refinement of gamma' precipitates with a certain volume fraction of precipitates leads to an improvement of creep resistance by delaying the plastic activity in the material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available