4.7 Article

Biochemical characterization of a novel L-asparaginase from Paenibacillus barengoltzii being suitable for acrylamide reduction in potato chips and mooncakes

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.115

Keywords

Paenibacillus barengjkkoltzii; L-asparaginase; Characterization; Acrylamide; Food safety

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [31325021]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars [T2014055]
  3. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund [2015SP003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel L-asparaginase gene (PbAsnase) from Paenibaeillus barengoltzii CAU904 was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli. The L-asparaginase gene was 1011 bp encoding 336 amino acids. Multiple sequence alignment of PbAsnase with other known L-asparaginases revealed that the enzyme showed high similarities with some Rhizobial-type L-asparaginases, sharing the highest identity of 32% with a characterized L-asparaginase from Rhizobium etli CFN 42, suggesting that it should be a novel L-asparaginase. The recombinant L-asparaginase (PbAsnase) was purified to homogeneity and biochemically characterized. The purified enzyme was optimally active at pH 8.5 and 45 degrees C, respectively. It was stable within pH 5.5-10.0 and at temperatures below 55 degrees C. PbAsnase exhibited strict substrate specificity towards L-asparagine (35.2 U/mg), with K-m and V-max values of 3.6 mM and 162.2 mu mol/min/mg, respectively, but displayed trace activity towards L-glutamine. Moreover, the application potential of PbAsnase on acrylamide migration in potato chips and mooncakes was evaluated. The pretreatment by PbAsnase significantly decreased the acrylamide contents in potato chips and mooncakes by 86% and 52%, respectively. The unique properties of PbAsnase may make it a good candidate in industries, especially in food safety. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available