4.7 Article

Hydrodynamic Response of the Intergalactic Medium to Reionization

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 898, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9f2f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. HST award [HST-AR15013.005-A]
  2. NSF [AST 1312724, AST 1614439]
  3. NASA [ATP NNX17AH68G]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) through a Starting Grant award AIDA [638809]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [638809] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intergalactic medium is expected to clump on scales down to 10(4)-10(8) M-circle dot before the onset of reionization. The impact of these small-scale structures on reionization is poorly understood despite the modern understanding that gas clumpiness limits the growth of H II regions. We use a suite of radiation-hydrodynamics simulations that capture the similar to 10(4)M(circle dot) Jeans mass of unheated gas to study density fluctuations during reionization. Our simulations track the complex ionization and hydrodynamical response of gas in the wake of ionization fronts. The clumping factor of ionized gas (proportional to the recombination rate) rises to a peak value of 5-20 approximately Delta t =10 Myr after ionization front passage, depending on the incident intensity, redshift, and degree to which the gas had been preheated by the first X-ray sources. The clumping factor reaches its relaxed value of approximate to 3 by Delta t=300 Myr. The mean free path of Lyman-limit photons evolves in unison, being up to several times shorter in unrelaxed, recently reionized regions compared to those that were reionized much earlier. Assessing the impact of this response on the global reionization process, we find that unrelaxed gaseous structures boost the total number of recombinations by approximate to 50% and lead to spatial fluctuations in the mean free path that persist appreciably for several hundred million years after the completion of reionization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available