4.7 Review

Systematic review with meta-analysis: efficacy of balloon-assisted enteroscopy for dilation of small bowel Crohn's disease strictures

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 52, Issue 7, Pages 1104-1116

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.16049

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [T32DK083251, P30DK097948 Pilot, K08DK110415]
  2. Helmsley Charitable Trust through the Stenosis Therapy and Anti-Fibrotic Research (STAR) Consortium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Evidence for endoscopic balloon dilation of small intestinal strictures in Crohn's disease (CD) using balloon-assisted enteroscopy is scarce. Aim To evaluate endoscopic balloon dilation for the treatment of small intestinal CD strictures using balloon-assisted enteroscopy. Methods Citations in Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane were systematically reviewed. In a meta-analysis of 18 studies with 463 patients and 1189 endoscopic balloon dilations, technical success was defined as the ability to dilate a stricture. Individual data were also obtained on 218 patients to identify outcome-relevant risk factors. Results In the pooled per-study analysis, technical success rate of endoscopic balloon dilation was 94.9%, resulting in short-term clinical efficacy in 82.3% of patients. Major complications occurred in 5.3% of patients. During follow-up, 48.3% of patients reported symptom recurrence, 38.8% were re-dilated and 27.4% proceeded to surgery. On the per-patient-based multivariable analysis, that patients with disease activity in the small intestine had lower short-term clinical efficacy (odds ratio 0.32; 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.73,P = 0.007). Patients with concomitant active disease in the small and/or large intestine had an increased risk to proceed toward surgery (hazard ratio 1.85; 95% confidence interval 1.09-3.13,P = 0.02 and hazard ratio 1.77; 95% confidence interval 1.34-2.34,P < 0.001). Conclusions Balloon-assisted enteroscopy for dilatation of CD-associated small intestinal strictures has high short-term technical and clinical efficacy and low complication rates. However, up to two-thirds of patients need re-dilation or surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available