4.7 Article

A radiative transfer model-based method for the estimation of grassland aboveground biomass

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2016.10.002

Keywords

Grassland aboveground biomass; Landsat 8 OLI product; Leaf area index; PROSAILH; Ill-posed inversion problem

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471293, 41671361]
  2. Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities [ZYGX2012Z005]
  3. National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2013AA12A302]
  4. China scholarship council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a novel method to derive grassland aboveground biomass (AGB) based on the PROSAILH (PROSPECT + SAILH) radiative transfer model (RTM). Two variables, leaf area index (LAI, m(2) m(-2), defined as a one-side leaf area per unit of horizontal ground area) and dry matter content (DMC, gcm(-2), defined as the dry matter per leaf area), were retrieved using PROSAILH and reflectance data from Landsat 8 OLI product. The result of LAI x DMC was regarded as the estimated grassland AGB according to their definitions. The well-known ill-posed inversion problem when inverting PROSAILH was alleviated using ecological criteria to constrain the simulation scenario and therefore the number of simulated spectra. A case study of the presented method was applied to a plateau grassland in China to estimate its AGB. The results were compared to those obtained using an exponential regression, a partial least squares regression (PLSR) and an artificial neural networks (ANN). The RTM-based method offered higher accuracy (R-2 = 0.64 and RMSE= 42.67 gm(-2)) than the exponential regression (R-2 = 0.48 and RMSE = 41.65 gm(-2)) and the ANN (R-2 =0.43 and RMSE= 46.26 gm(-2)). However, the proposed method offered similar performance than PLSR as presented better determination coefficient than PLSR (R-2 = 0.55) but higher RMSE (RMSE = 37.79 gm(-2)). Although it is still necessary to test these methodologies in other areas, the RTM-based method offers greater robustness and reproducibility to estimate grassland AGB at large scale without the need to collect field measurements and therefore is considered the most promising methodology. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available