4.8 Article

Insight into atomically dispersed porous M-N-C single-site catalysts for electrochemical CO2reduction

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 12, Issue 31, Pages 16617-16626

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr03044a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB36000000]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2016YFA0200700]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772957, 21890381, 21721002]
  4. Frontier Science Key Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDJ-SSW-SLH038]
  5. K. C. Wong Education Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transition metal single-site catalysts have unique activities for electrochemical CO(2)reduction. However, the exact active center and reaction mechanism remain unclear due to a number of challenges in the controllable synthesis of single-atom catalysts (SACs) and defects in metal supports. Here we combine both experimental and theoretical calculations to systematically explore the mechanistic reaction path of selected transition metal single sites on nitrogen-doped porous carbon. Facile pyrolysis was employed to prepare a fullerene type carbon with 0.35 nm interlayer distances to support the family of M-N-C (M = Ni, Fe, Co and Cu). Experimentally, Ni and Fe outperform the other metals with high faradaic efficiency up to >97% and 86.8%, respectively. The theoretical calculations reveal that Ni-N-C exhibits optimum activity for CO(2)reduction to CO at a higher overpotential because of the moderate *CO binding energy at the Ni site, which accommodates *COOH formation and *CO desorption. Furthermore, the strong binding energy of *CO on the Fe site enables the catalyst to reduce CO(2)beyond CO. A remarkable current density of 17.6 mA cm(-2)has been achieved with the Ni-N-C catalyst and a record of 5.74 s(-1)TOF has been realized at -0.8 Vvs. RHE for the Ni-N-C catalyst.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available