4.7 Article

Constraints on the Physical Properties of GW190814 through Simulations Based on DECam Follow-up Observations by the Dark Energy Survey

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 901, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abafaa

Keywords

Gravitational wave sources; Optical observation; Light curve classification; Astronomical simulations

Funding

  1. LSSTC
  2. Brinson Foundation
  3. Moore Foundation
  4. FONDECYT [1201223]
  5. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [1744555]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy
  7. U.S. National Science Foundation
  8. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  9. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  10. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  11. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  12. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  13. Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics at The Ohio State University
  14. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  15. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  16. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  17. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  18. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  19. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  20. Argonne National Laboratory
  21. University of California at Santa Cruz
  22. University of Cambridge
  23. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  24. University of Chicago
  25. University College London
  26. DES-Brazil Consortium
  27. University of Edinburgh
  28. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich
  29. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  30. University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign
  31. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  32. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  33. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  34. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat Munchen
  35. associated Excellence Cluster Universe
  36. University of Michigan
  37. NFS's NOIRLab
  38. University of Nottingham
  39. Ohio State University
  40. University of Pennsylvania
  41. University of Portsmouth
  42. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  43. Stanford University
  44. University of Sussex
  45. Texas AM University
  46. OzDES Membership Consortium
  47. NASA [NNG17PX03C]
  48. NSF [AST-1815935]
  49. Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation
  50. Heising-Simons Foundation
  51. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  52. National Science Foundation [2012B-0001, AST-1138766, AST-1536171]
  53. MICINN [ESP2017-89838, PGC2018-094773, PGC2018-102021, SEV-2016-0588, SEV-2016-0597, MDM-2015-0509]
  54. ERDF funds from the European Union
  55. CERCA program of the Generalitat de Catalunya
  56. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013)
  57. ERC [240672, 291329, 306478]
  58. Brazilian Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia (INCT) e-Universe (CNPq) [465376/2014-2]
  59. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  60. NSF Cybertraining Grant [1829740]
  61. STFC [ST/R000433/1, ST/R000476/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  62. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  63. Division Of Graduate Education [1744555] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On 2019 August 14, the LIGO and Virgo Collaborations detected gravitational waves from a black hole and a 2.6 solar mass compact object, possibly the first neutron star-black hole merger. In search of an optical counterpart, the Dark Energy Survey (DES) obtained deep imaging of the entire 90% confidence level localization area with Blanco/DECam 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 16 nights after the merger. Objects with varying brightness were detected by the DES Pipeline, and we systematically reduced the candidate counterparts through catalog matching, light-curve properties, host-galaxy photometric redshifts, Southern Astrophysical Research spectroscopic follow-up observations, and machine-learning-based photometric classification. All candidates were rejected as counterparts to the merger. To quantify the sensitivity of our search, we applied our selection criteria to full light-curve simulations of supernovae and kilonovae as they would appear in the DECam observations. Because the source class of the merger was uncertain, we utilized an agnostic, three-component kilonova model based on tidally disrupted neutron star (NS) ejecta properties to quantify our detection efficiency of a counterpart if the merger included an NS. We find that, if a kilonova occurred during this merger, configurations where the ejected matter is greater than 0.07 solar masses, has lanthanide abundance less than 10(-8.56), and has a velocity between 0.18cand 0.21care disfavored at the 2 sigma level. Furthermore, we estimate that our background reduction methods are capable of associating gravitational wave signals with a detected electromagnetic counterpart at the 4 sigma level in 95% of future follow-up observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available