4.6 Article

Exclusive enhancement of catalytic activity in Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3 nanostructures: new insights into the design of efficient piezocatalysts and piezophotocatalysts

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 8, Issue 32, Pages 16238-16245

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta14007g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSFC [51802143]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [JCYJ20180504165648211, JCYJ20170818160503855]
  3. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD2016022619584022]
  4. Shenzhen Clean Energy Research Institute [CERI-KY-2019-003]
  5. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515110871]
  6. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Piezocatalysis and piezo-photocatalysis have recently emerged as promising strategies to address energy and environmental issues through harvesting mechanical energy. Herein, we report that electrical conductivity, rather than piezoelectric coefficient, is more decisive in determining piezocatalytic and piezopotential enhanced photocatalytic activities. The high electrical conductivity of Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3 leads to superior piezo-photocatalytic catalytic activity compared to other reported piezocatalysts for water splitting (H-2 production of 158 mu mol g(-1) h(-1)), Cr(VI) reduction (first-order rate constant of 0.045 min(-1)), and degradation of organic pollutants (first-order rate constant of 0.061 min(-1) for RhB) by introducing sunlight and ultrasonic mechanical vibration with a frequency of 20-80 kHz. Furthermore, the mechanical power, vibration frequency, and particle size of the material are important factors to optimize the piezocatalytic and piezo-photocatalytic performance. This work provides a useful guide to design new piezocatalytic or piezo-photocatalytic materials by synergistically considering the electrical conductivity and piezoelectric coefficient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available