4.5 Article

Comparative genomic analysis of the IId subtype family of Cryptosporidium parvum

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 281-290

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.12.002

Keywords

Cryptosporidium parvum; Genomics; Whole genome sequencing; Host adaptation; Transmission

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31229005, 31425025, 31110103901]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Lanzhou, China [SKLVEB2014KFKT008]
  3. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Host adaptation is known to occur in Cryptosporidium parvum, with Ha and IId subtype families preferentially infecting calves and lambs, respectively. To improve our understanding of the genetic basis of host adaptation in Cryptosporidium parvum, we sequenced the genomes of two IId specimens and one Ila specimen from China and Egypt using the Illumina technique and compared them with the published Ha IOWA genome. Sequence data were obtained for >99.3% of the expected genome. Comparative genomic analysis identified differences in numbers of three subtelomeric gene families between sequenced genomes and the reference genome, including those encoding SKSR secretory proteins, the MEDLE family of secretory proteins, and insulinase-like proteases. These gene gains and losses compared with the reference genome were confirmed by PCR analysis. Altogether, 5,191-5,766 single nucleotide variants were seen between genomes sequenced in this study and the reference genome, with most SNVs occurring in subtelomeric regions of chromosomes 1, 4, and 6. The most highly polymorphic genes between Ha and IId encode mainly invasion-associated and immunodominant mucin proteins, and other families of secretory proteins. Further studies are needed to verify the biological significance of these genomic differences. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian Society for Parasitology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available