4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Analysis of Gas Permeation Phenomena in a PEM Water Electrolyzer Operated at High Pressure and High Current Density

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 167, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/abaa68

Keywords

PEM electrolysis; hydrogen permeation; gas crossover; high pressure

Funding

  1. Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Media, Energy and Technology through the project ZAE-ST (storage technologies)
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03SFK2V0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, on-line mass spectrometry is used to determine hydrogen permeation during proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer (PEM-WE) operation for a wide range of current densities (0-6 A cm(-2)) and operating pressures (1-30 bar, differential pressure). H(2)permeation measurements with a permeation cell setup, i.e., without applying a current, show a linear correlation between permeation rate and H(2)partial pressure, indicating diffusion as the main crossover mechanism. Measurements with full membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) during PEM-WE operation reveal a significant increase of the gas permeation rate at high current densities, by up to 20-fold at 1 bar H(2)and up to 1.2-fold at 30 bar H-2(Nafion212 or Nafion117 membrane; Ir-black (anode) and Pt/C (cathode)). Recently, H(2)super-saturation of the ionomer phase in the cathode catalyst layer was shown to be the reason for this increase, and we discuss the impact of this effect for different electrode compositions and operating conditions. Finally, the determined H(2)permeation rates and electrolyzer performance are used to discuss the overall PEM-WE efficiency for different membrane thicknesses and it is shown that the formation of an explosive gas mixture in the anode at low current densities requires additional mitigation strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available