4.2 Article

Normative Data for Novel Nominal Metaphors, Novel Similes, Literal, and Anomalous Utterances in Polish and English

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages 541-569

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-020-09695-7

Keywords

Metaphors; Normative data; Novel nominal metaphors; Novel similes; Polish; English; Cloze probability; Meaningfulness; Familiarity; Metaphoricity; Comparison mechanisms

Funding

  1. Narodowe Centrum Nauki [2017/25/N/HS2/00615] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The two studies reported in the article provide normative measures for 120 novel nominal metaphors, 120 novel similes, 120 literal sentences, and 120 anomalous utterances in Polish (Study 1) and in English (Study 2). The presented set is ideally suited to addressing methodological requirements in research on metaphor processing. The critical (sentence-final) words of each utterance were controlled for in terms of their frequency per million, number of letters and syllables. For each condition in each language, the following variables are reported: cloze probability, meaningfulness, metaphoricity, and familiarity, whose results confirm that the sentences are well-matched. Consequently, the present paper provides materials that can be employed in order to test the new as well as existing theories of metaphor comprehension. The results obtained from the series of normative tests showed the same pattern in both studies, where the comparison structure present in similes (i.e.,A is like B) facilitated novel metaphor comprehension, as compared to categorical statements (i.e.,A is B). It therefore indicates that comparison mechanisms might be engaged in novel meaning construction irrespectively of language-specific syntactic rules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available