4.4 Article

Phase-field boundary conditions for the voxel finite cell method: Surface-free stress analysis of CT-based bone structures

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2880

Keywords

diffuse boundary methods; femur; phase-fields; patient-specific simulation; voxel finite cell method; vertebra

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CISE-1565997]
  2. NSF CAREER [1651577]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [637164 - ERC-2014-STG]
  4. German Research Foundation [BA 4085 2/1]
  5. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC)
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1565997] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The voxel finite cell method uses unfitted finite element meshes and voxel quadrature rules to seamlessly transfer computed tomography data into patient-specific bone discretizations. The method, however, still requires the explicit parametrization of boundary surfaces to impose traction and displacement boundary conditions, which constitutes a potential roadblock to automation. We explore a phase-field-based formulation for imposing traction and displacement constraints in a diffuse sense. Its essential component is a diffuse geometry model generated from metastable phase-field solutions of the Allen-Cahn problem that assumes the imaging data as initial condition. Phase-field approximations of the boundary and its gradient are then used to transfer all boundary terms in the variational formulation into volumetric terms. We show that in the context of the voxel finite cell method, diffuse boundary conditions achieve the same accuracy as boundary conditions defined over explicit sharp surfaces, if the inherent length scales, ie, the interface width of the phase field, the voxel spacing, and the mesh size, are properly related. We demonstrate the flexibility of the new method by analyzing stresses in a human femur and a vertebral body.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available