4.5 Article

UV/chlorinevs.UV/H2O2for water reuse at Orange County Water District, CA: a pilot study

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-WATER RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages 2416-2431

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ew00316f

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On-site demonstration tests evaluated 1,4-dioxane removal in reverse osmosis permeate (RO permeate) at the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Advanced Water Purification Facility (AWPF). The study used a pilot-scale ultraviolet (UV) reactor to compare efficacy of UV/chloramine, UV/chloramine/H(2)O(2)and UV/chloramine/HOCl advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). The UV/chloramine process did not achieve the targeted 0.5 log removal of 1,4-dioxane even at a high UV fluence of 4400 mJ cm(-2)and the 1,4-dioxane decay did not followpseudo-first order kinetics. Oxidant concentrations as low as 2.6 mg L(-1)H(2)O(2)or similar to 1.0 mg L(-1)free Cl-2(HOCl) in the RO permeate at ambient quality parameters,e.g.2.2-2.4 mg L(-1)monochloramine (as Cl-2), 1.2-1.4 mg L(-1)dichloramine (as Cl-2), <= 0.08 mg L-1NO2-(UV/H(2)O(2)AOP), similar to 97.0%T, resulted in 0.56 and >= 0.51 log reduction of 1,4-dioxane with the UV/chloramine/H(2)O(2)and UV/chloramine/HOCl process, respectively, while simultaneously achieving similar to 2.0 log reduction of NDMA. Overall, the UV/chloramine/HOCl process showed higher removal efficiency of 1,4-dioxane than UV/chloramine/H(2)O(2)for the same mass-based oxidant concentrations and process conditions. Nitrite ions present in the RO permeate and/or generated from monochloramine photolysis during the UV/AOP impacted significantly the process performance. It was confirmed through these pilot-scale tests that the removal of 1,4-dioxane in the UV/chloramine/H(2)O(2)and UV/chloramine/HOCl processes can be predicted accurately with a comprehensive mechanistic kinetic model that accounts for the molecular and radical reactions that occur in the RO permeate in the UV reactor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available