4.7 Article

Deformation characteristics of the intermetallic alloy 60NiTi

Journal

INTERMETALLICS
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages 40-52

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2016.11.003

Keywords

60NiTi; Shape memory alloy; Stress-induced martensite; Strain-induced coarsening; Bearing; Ni4Ti3 precipitates

Funding

  1. NASA (ARMD) Transformational Tools & Technologies (TTT) project
  2. Division of Scientific User Facilities, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05- 00OR22725]
  3. UT-Battelle, LLC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The deformation behavior of a Ni-rich Ni55Ti45 (at.%) alloy, commonly known as 60NiTi (as designated in wt.%), was analyzed using neutron and synchrotron x-ray diffraction during in situ isothermal tension and compression loading, and pre and post-test electron microscopy. The alloy was shown to exhibit remarkable strength and high hardness resulting from a high density of fine Ni4Ti3 precipitates (size similar to 67 nm), which were uniformly dispersed throughout the matrix after a solution treatment and oil quench. The precipitate volume fraction was 55 +/- 3%, determined from both the neutron Rietveld refinement and conventional x-ray measurements. Non-linear stress-strain behavior was observed in tension (but not in compression) and was attributed to reversible stress-induced martensite (SIM) that forms to accommodate the stress as revealed by neutron diffraction measurements. The tensile and compressive neutron data also showed peak broadening and residual lattice strains. Transmission and scanning electron microscopy revealed stress-induced coarsening of Ni4Ti3 precipitates in both tension and compression tested samples, but precipitation and growth of the stable Ni3Ti phase was observed only after tensile testing. Finally, the potential ramifications of these microstructural changes are discussed. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available