4.0 Article

Design framework for robotic surgery wards at hospitals: Computational implementation

Journal

FRONTIERS OF ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 514-540

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2020.05.002

Keywords

Robotic surgery ward design; Architectural and economic design consideration; Design framework; Computational implementation; Shape grammar

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Robotic surgery is one of the most recent technologies in healthcare building field. Due to the design complexity of Robotic surgery wards, computational implementations are being developed to either measure the effect of inserting advanced technologies as Electronic medical recorders and tele surgery, or evaluate design alternatives on healthcare building. This paper presents a design framework that responds to the need for coordinating design phases for Robotic Surgery Wards (RSWs) computationally. This proposed design framework for RSWs can generate functional RSW alternatives and more than one solution for each alternative. The framework has been structured based on the main architectural considerations of RSWs which are geometric and topological, the economic considerations, specific developed pools for shape and corridor patterns, and the theory of Shape Grammarshas been utilized to compute the framework to generate a vast number of design alternatives. Accordingly, a computational implementation has been established to assist designers in early design stages. Numerical validation for the applications of the developed framework and implementation has been conducted by using reference examples of RSWs. The main finding in this paper is providing healthcare building designers with a computational implementation that generates RSW alternative computationally based on specific shape and cost levels. (C) 2020 Higher Education Press Limited Company. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available