4.2 Article

Follicle Stimulating Hormone Inhibits the Expression of p53 Up-Regulated Modulator of Apoptosis Induced by Reactive Oxygen Species Through PI3K/Akt in Mouse Granulosa Cells

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages 687-694

Publisher

ACAD SCIENCES CZECH REPUBLIC, INST PHYSIOLOGY
DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.934421

Keywords

Follicle stimulating hormone; Oxidative stress; PI3K/AKT; Granulosa cells

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development (973 program) [2014CB138502]
  2. Qinglan Project of JiangSu Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In mammalian ovaries, follicular atresia occurs periodically and destroys almost all the follicles in the ovary. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) acts as the primary survival factor during follicular atresia by preventing apoptosis in granulosa cells (GCs). Many studies have demonstrated that oxidative stress-induced apoptosis is a main cause of follicular atresia. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced GCs apoptosis is regulated by a variety of signaling pathways involving numerous genes and transcription factors. Therefore, we examined whether FSH inhibits the expression of p53 up-regulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) through phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) / protein kinase B (AKT) in mouse GCs. In vivo study: thirty-two-mice were randomly assigned to four groups and given FSH. We found that FSH can inhibit the 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NP) induced apoptosis and PUMA expression in mRNA level. Moreover, in vitro experiment, we found that FSH can inhibit the H2O2 -induced apoptosis and PUMA expression in mRNA level. Additionally, we also found that PI3K/AKT inhibitor LY294002 abolished the downregulation of PUMA mRNA by FSH in vitro. In conclusion, FSH inhibit the expression of PUMA induced by ROS through PI3K/AKT pathway in vivo and vitro.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available