4.5 Article

Management of Patients with Normal Cystoscopy but Positive Cytology or Urine Markers

Journal

EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 548-554

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.017

Keywords

Bacillus Calmette-Guerin; Cystoscopy; Cytology

Funding

  1. Archer
  2. Nucleix
  3. Ipsen
  4. Olympus
  5. Storz
  6. Arquer
  7. UCB
  8. BTA
  9. Cepheid
  10. Astellas
  11. GSK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This presentation considers follow-up after successful transurethral resection of a high-grade non-muscle-invasive tumour, with normal cystoscopy, followed by bacillus-Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy. Focusing on two possible outcomes, a positive cytology but a negative urinary biomarker result, versus positive biomarkers but a negative cytology, we discuss what the evidence and guidelines recommend and which test is more robust. Patient summary: Bladder cancer is usually assessed by examination of tissue taken from the bladder, either by surgery or by biopsy; however, trace elements in the urine, known as biomarkers, can also provide an assessment. The challenge arises when the two methods do not agree: the tissue sample is positive for cancer, but the biomarker is negative, or the reverse. For now, these authors conclude that the tissue examination is more reliable than the biomarker result. (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available