4.4 Article

Complications and risk factors for complications of implanted subcutaneous ports for intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 497-+

Publisher

CHINESE JOURNAL CANCER RESEARCH CO
DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.04.07

Keywords

Gastric cancer; peritoneal metastasis; intraperitoneal chemotherapy; paclitaxel; port complication

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772518]
  2. Multicenter Clinical Trial of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine [DLY201602]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy through subcutaneous port is an effective treatment for gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). The objective of this study is to assess the port complications and risk factors for complications in GC patients with PM. Methods: In retrospective screening of 301 patients with subcutaneous ports implantation, 249 GC patients with PM who received IP chemotherapy were screened out for analysis. Port complications and risk factors for complications were analyzed. Results: Of the 249 analyzed patients, 57 (22.9%) experienced port complications. Subcutaneous liquid accumulation (42.1%) and infection (28.1%) were the main complications, and other complications included port rotation (14.1%), wound dehiscence (12.3%), inflow obstruction (1.7%) and subcutaneous metastasis (1.7%). The median interval between port implantation and occurrence of complications was 3.0 months. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status [odds ratio (OR), 1.74; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.12-2.69], albumin (OR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.96-6.86), implantation procedure optimization (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18-0.61) and implantation groups (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20-0.69) were independent risk factors for port complications (P<0.05). ECOG performance status was the only factor that related to the grades of port complications (P=0.016). Conclusion. Port complications in GC patients who received IP chemotherapy are manageable. ECOG performance status, albumin, implantation procedure and implantation group are independent risk factors for port complications in GC patients with PM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available