4.3 Review

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Osteoradionecrosis of the Mandible: a Systematic Review of Preclinical and Human Studies

Journal

STEM CELL REVIEWS AND REPORTS
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 1208-1221

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12015-020-10034-5

Keywords

Osteoradionecrosis; Mesenchymal stem cells; Cell therapy; ORN; Systematic review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the mandible is a severe complication of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer and is arduously difficult to manage. Current treatment options carry risks with some patients remaining incurable. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC) therapy has shown promising results supporting osteogenesis and regeneration of radiotherapy-damaged tissues. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the safety and efficacy of MSCs in treating ORN. Methods A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE, Embase, Cochranes Library online databases, andto identify preclinical and clinical studies examining the effect of MSCs on osseous healing of ORN. The preclinical studies were assessed according to the SYRCLEs guidelines and risk of bias tool. Results Six studies (n = 142) from 5 countries were eligible for analysis. Of these four were preclinical studies and two clinical case studies. Preclinical studies found MSC treatment to be safe, demonstrating bone restorative effects and improved soft tissue regeneration. In the clinical cases, healing of bone and soft tissue was reported with no serious adverse events. Conclusion The evidence from the included studies suggests that MSCs may have beneficial regenerative effects on the healing of ORN. None of the studies reported adverse events with the use of MSCs. More carefully controlled studies with well-identified cells are however needed to demonstrate the efficacy of MSCs in a clinical setting. Graphical abstract

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available