4.6 Article

Gauge invariance of the Dicke and Hopfield models

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.023718

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NTT Research
  2. Army Research Office (ARO) [W911NF-18-1-0358, W911NF1910065]
  3. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (Q-LEAP program)
  4. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (CREST Grant) [JPMJCR1676]
  5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (KAKENHI Grant) [JP20H00134]
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (JSPS-RFBR Grant) [JPJSBP120194828]
  7. Foundational Questions Institute Fund (FQXi) of the Silicon Valley Community Foundation [FQXi-IAF19-06]
  8. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [W911NF1910065] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Dicke model, which describes the dipolar coupling between N two-level atoms and a quantized electromagnetic field, seemingly violates gauge invariance in the presence of ultrastrong light-matter coupling, a regime that is now experimentally accessible in many physical systems. Specifically, it has been shown that, while the two-level approximation can work well in the dipole gauge, the Coulomb gauge fails to provide the correct spectra in the ultrastrong coupling regime. Here we show that, taking into account the nonlocality of the atomic potential induced by the two-level approximation, gauge invariance is fully restored for arbitrary interaction strengths, even in the N -> infinity limit. Finally, we express the Hopfield model, a general description based on the quantization of a linear dielectric medium, in a manifestly gauge-invariant form, and show that the Dicke model in the dilute regime can be regarded as a particular case of the more general Hopfield model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available