When does intraoperative 3D-imaging play a role in transpedicular C2 screw placement?

Introduction: The stabilization of an atlantoaxial (C1-C2) instability is demanding due to a complex atlantoaxial anatomy with proximity to the spinal cord, a variable run of the vertebral artery (VA) and narrow C2 pedicles. We perfomed the Goel & Harms fusion in combination with an intraoperative 3D imaging to ensure correct screw placement in the C2 pedicle. We hypothesized, that narrow C2 pedicles lead to a higher malposition rate of screws by perforation of the pedicle wall. The purpose of this study was to describe a certain pedicle size, under which the perforation rate rises. Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, all patients (n = 30) were operated in the Goel & Harms technique. The isthmus height and pedicle diameter of C2 were measured. The achieved screw position in C2 was evaluated according to Gertzbein & Robbin classification (GRGr). Results: A statistically significant correlation was found between the pedicles size (isthmus height/pedicle diameter) and the achieved GRGr for the right (p = 0.002/p = 0.03) and left side (p = 0.018/p = 0.008). The ROC analysis yielded a Cut Off value for the pedicle size to distinguish between an intact or perforated pedicle wall (GRGr 1 or >= 2). The Cut-Off value was identified for the isthmus height (right 6.1 mm, left 5.4 mm) and for the pedicle diameter (6.6 mm both sides). Conclusion: The hypothesis, that narrow pedicles lead to a higher perforation rate of the pedicle wall, can be accepted. Pedicles of < 6.6 mm turned out to be a risk factor for a perforation of the pedicle wall (GRGr 2 or higher). Intraoperative 3D imaging is a feasible tool to confirm optimal screw position, which becomes even more important in cases with thin pedicles. The rising risk of VA injury in these cases support the additional use of navigation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.