4.7 Article

New cosmogenic nuclide burial-dating model indicates onset of major glaciations in the Alps during Middle Pleistocene Transition

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 549, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116491

Keywords

cosmogenic nuclides; burial dating; inverse Monte Carlo modelling; first major Alpine glaciations; Pleistocene climate

Funding

  1. National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (NAGRA) in Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A set of four outwash terraces in the northern Alpine Foreland motivated Penck and Bruckner's classical scheme of four great Alpine ice ages: Giinz, Mindel, Riss, and Wiirm. While it is now established that the Wiirm corresponds to marine isotope stages (MIS) 5d-2 (similar to 117-14 ka) and the Riss type locality to MIS 6 (similar to 191-130 ka), there is no consensus regarding the age of the older glaciations. The two oldest terraces, known as TIOhere Deckenschotter (HDS) and Tiefere Deckenschotter (TDS) in Switzerland and neighbouring Germany, contain interbedded tills that directly indicate the first arrival of glaciers into the northern Alpine Foreland. Here, we set out to constrain the timing of the HDS, which signal the first major glaciations in the Alps. To achieve this goal, we devised a new burial-dating model tailored to glaciogenic sediments: P-PINI (Particle Pathway Inversion of Nuclide Inventories). The method applies a source-to-sink framework to a cosmogenic (BeAl)-Be-10-Al-26 inversion model accounting for variable cosmic-ray exposure and non-steady erosion. Taking published (BeAl)-Be-10-Al-26 data from five HDS sites (Feusi, Tromsberg, Siglistorf, Irchel Steig, and Irchel Hiltz) and one TDS site (Iberig), we obtain age distributions (+/- 1 sigma) that are especially well constrained for Feusi (0.93 +/- 0.13 Ma), Iberig (0.93 +/- 0.17 Ma), and Tromsberg (0.88 +/- 0.14 Ma), less well-constrained for Irchel Steig (0.69 +/- 0.25 Ma) and Siglistorf (0.94 +/- 0.27 Ma), and very poorly constrained for Irchel Hiltz (1.39 +/- 0.56 Ma). Consistent with the morphostratigraphy, which dictates that the TDS postdates the HDS, we implemented a Bayesian modelling framework, yielding an age of 0.69 +/- 0.12 Ma for Iberig (TDS) and a combined age of 0.95 +/- 0.07 Ma for the HDS sites. Based on the P-PINI burial ages as well as the combined, Bayesian burial age, we propose an age around 1.0-0.9 Ma for the onset of the large Alpine glaciations that triggered the accumulation of the HDS outwash sediments. This roughly accords with the first long glaciation of the Pleistocene (MIS 24-22), identified as a step-change to colder climate and larger glaciations towards the end of the Middle Pleistocene Transition. While our results challenge previously reported ages of similar to 2 Ma or more for the HDS in Switzerland, they corroborate evidence from the southern Alpine retroforeland and provide quantitative support for the early hypothesis by GJ. Kukla, who ascribed the oldest glacial deposits in the northern Alpine Foreland to around MIS 22. Finally, we suggest that the source-to-sink approach of P-PINI offers a viable alternative to the established isochron burial-dating method in cases involving non-steady exposure and erosion. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available