4.6 Article

Classification of visible and infrared hyperspectral images based on image segmentation and edge-preserving filtering

Journal

INFRARED PHYSICS & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 79-88

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2016.12.010

Keywords

Hyperspectral image classification; Image segmentation; Edge-preserving filtering; Feature extraction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41406200]
  2. Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation of China [ZR2014DQ030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The classification of hyperspectral images with a few labeled samples is a major challenge which is difficult to meet unless some spatial characteristics can be exploited. In this study, we proposed a novel spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification method that exploited spatial autocorrelation of hyperspectral images. First, image segmentation is performed on the hyperspectral image to assign each pixel to a homogeneous region. Second, the visible and infrared bands of hyperspectral image are partitioned into multiple subsets of adjacent bands, and each subset is merged into one band. Recursive edge-preserving filtering is performed on each merged band Which utilizes the spectral information of neighborhood pixels. Third, the resulting spectral and spatial feature band set is classified using the SVM classifier. Finally, bilateral filtering is performed to remove salt-and-pepper noise in the classification result. To preserve the spatial structure of hyperspectral image, edge-preserving filtering is applied independently before and after the classification process. Experimental results on different hyperspectral images prove that the proposed spectral-spatial classification approach is robust and offers more classification accuracy than state-of-the-art methods when the number of labeled samples is small. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available