4.8 Article

Multicomponent and multicatalytic asymmetric synthesis of furo[2,3-b]pyrrole derivatives: further insights into the mode of action of chiral phosphoric acid catalysts

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue 34, Pages 9181-9190

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0sc03342a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CTQ2016-76794-P]
  2. Consejeria de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidad del Principado de Asturias [IDI/2018/000231]
  3. Xunta de Galicia (DXPCTSUG) [GRC ED431C2017/61]
  4. Xunta de Galicia (FEDER Unha maneira de facer Europa) [ED-431G/02-FEDER]
  5. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (FPU-predoctoral grant)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multicomponent and multicatalytic reactions are those processes that try to imitate the way the enzymatic machinery transforms simple building blocks into complex products. The development of asymmetric versions of these reactions is a step forward in our dream of mirroring the exquisite selectivity of biological processes. In this context, the present work describes a new reaction for the asymmetric synthesis of furo[2,3-b]pyrrole derivatives from simple 3-butynamines, glyoxylic acid and anilines in the presence of a dual catalytic system, formed from a gold complex and a chiral phosphoric acid. Computations, aimed to understand the exceptional performance of 9-anthracenyl-substituted BINOL-derived phosphoric acid catalyst, suggest a fundamental role of non-covalent interactions being established between the catalyst and the reagents for the outcome of the multicomponent process. The linear geometry of the anthracenyl substituent along with the presence of an electron-withdrawing group in the aniline and an aromatic substituent in the 3-butynamine derivative seem to be key structural factors to explain the experimental results and, particularly, the high stereoselectivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available