4.7 Article

An enhanced artificial neural network with a shuffled complex evolutionary global optimization with principal component analysis

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 418, Issue -, Pages 302-316

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.08.003

Keywords

SP-UCI; Evolutionary algorithm; Artificial neural networks; Weight training; Global optimization

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE Prime Award) [DE-IA0000018]
  2. California Energy Commission (CEC Award) [300-15-005]
  3. MASEEH fellowship
  4. NSF CyberSEES Project [CCF-1331915]
  5. NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC [NA09NES4400006]
  6. NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC (NCSU CICS) [2009-1380-01]
  7. U.S. Army Research Office [W911NF-11-1-0422]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The classical Back-Propagation (BP) scheme with gradient-based optimization in training Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) suffers from many drawbacks, such as the premature convergence, and the tendency of being trapped in local optimums. Therefore, as an alternative for the BP and gradient-based optimization schemes, various Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs), i.e., Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Simulated Annealing (SA), and Differential Evolution (DE), have gained popularity in the field of ANN weight training. This study applied a new efficient and effective Shuffled Complex Evolutionary Global Optimization Algorithm with Principal Component Analysis - University of California Irvine (SP-UCI) to the weight training process of a three-layer feed-forward ANN. A large-scale numerical comparison is conducted among the SP-UCI-, PSO-, GA-, SA-, and DE-based ANNs on 17 benchmark, complex, and real-world datasets. Results show that SP-UCI-based ANN outperforms other EA-based ANNs in the context of convergence and generalization. Results suggest that the SP-UCI algorithm possesses good potential in support of the weight training of ANN in real-word problems. In addition, the suitability of different kinds of EAs on training ANN is discussed. The large-scale comparison experiments conducted in this paper are fundamental references for selecting proper ANN weight training algorithms in practice. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available