4.7 Article

Robust stochastic configuration networks with kernel density estimation for uncertain data regression

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 412, Issue -, Pages 210-222

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.05.047

Keywords

Stochastic configuration networks; Robust data regression; Randomized algorithms; Kernel density estimation; Alternating optimization techniques

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neural networks have been widely used as predictive models to fit data distribution, and they could be implemented through learning a collection of samples. In many applications, however, the given dataset may contain noisy samples or outliers which may result in a poor learner model in terms of generalization. This paper contributes to a development of robust stochastic configuration networks (RSCNs) for resolving uncertain data regression problems. RSCNs are built on original stochastic configuration networks with weighted least squares method for evaluating the output weights, and the input weights and biases are incrementally and randomly generated by satisfying with a set of inequality constrains. The kernel density estimation (KDE) method is employed to set the penalty weights for each training samples, so that some negative impacts, caused by noisy data or outliers, on the resulting learner model can be reduced. The alternating optimization technique is applied for updating a RSCN model with improved penalty weights computed from the kernel density estimation function. Performance evaluation is carried out by a function approximation, four benchmark datasets and a case study on engineering application. Comparisons to other robust randomised neural modelling techniques, including the probabilistic robust learning algorithm for neural networks with random weights and improved RVFL networks, indicate that the proposed RSCNs with KDE perform favourably and demonstrate good potential for real-world applications. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available